Research and Development in Public Law

Research and Development in Public Law

Constitutional Resilience

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Associate Professor in Public Law, Department of Law, Faculty of humanities, Bu - Ali Sina university, Hamedan, Iran
Abstract
The constitution is one of the most fundamental and at the same time the most complex institutions in the science of law, which, as the supreme legal document in a political system, has a profound impact on a wide range of areas and shapes government, political authority and the protection of individual rights. Due to this central role, numerous concepts and terms have emerged in relation to the constitution, each of which is analyzed in constitutional theory. Among these concepts, the concept of constitutional resilience is of great importance. Employing a descriptive–analytical methodology, this research seeks to answer the core question: what does constitutional resilience actually mean? Like any other institution, a constitution is not immune to deficiencies, crises, and challenges. A resilient constitution is one that, while remaining faithful to its fundamental principles and values, demonstrates the capacity to adapt to new circumstances, respond to crises, and renew itself in order to ensure continuity and survival. In this sense, constitutional resilience reflects both stability and flexibility, allowing the constitution to endure in the face of change. The study identifies several advantages of constitutional resilience, including the preservation of democracy and the rule of law, adaptability to evolving political and social realities, resistance to threats and challenges, and reinforcement of constitutional legitimacy. At the same time, resilience is not without risks. Potential disadvantages include the erosion of constitutional norms, the possibility of authoritarian capture, and excessive reliance on informal mechanisms rather than institutionalized safeguards. Furthermore, constitutional resilience is closely linked to the notion of democratic resilience, a relationship that this article examines in detail. The comparative experiences of different countries illustrate the diverse outcomes of constitutional resilience. In some aspects, constitutions have successfully withstood crises and are cited as positive examples of resilience. In others, however, the absence of resilience has undermined constitutional performance and led to failure. By presenting examples from both categories, this article highlights the importance of studying constitutional resilience as a means of deepening our understanding of the constitution itself. Understanding and theorizing this concept can help the constitution overcome the inevitable problems that arise along its path.
Keywords
Subjects

Ackerman.Bruce. (2000)”The New Separation of Powers” Harvard Law Review Vol. 113, No. 3. pp. 633-729
Albert, Richard and Pal, Michael, (2018)”The Democratic Resilience of the Canadian Constitution” In: Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Mark Graber, Sanford Levinson and Mark Tushnet, eds. Oxford University Press 2018, Forthcoming), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3089941 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3089941
Balázs. István, György Gajduschek, and István Hoffman. (2025) “Eliminating Conservation’? The Re-Regulation of Hungarian Administrative Procedure in the Act on General Administrative Procedure”. In: Fruzsina Gárdos-Orosz Editor. The Resilience of the Hungarian Legal System since 2010 A Failed Resilience? Springer press
Balkin, Jack M. (2017) "Constitutional crisis and constitutional rot.". Maryland Law Review Vol77. Pp147-160
Bencze. Mátyás. (2025)” The Resilience of the Hungarian Court System Between 2012 and 2020”. In: Fruzsina Gárdos-Orosz Editor. The Resilience of the Hungarian Legal System since 2010 A Failed Resilience? Springer
Bermeo, Nancy(2016) “On Democratic Backsliding”, journal of democracy, vol 27. No 1,pp 5-19
Contiades, Xenophon, and Alkmene Fotiadou. (2019) "Constitutional Resilience and Unamendability: Amendment Powers as Mechanisms of Constitutional Resilience." European Journal of Law Reform. vol21. Pp243
Contiades. Xenophon and Alkmene Fotiadou (2015)”On Resilience of Constitutions. What Makes Constitutions Resistant to External Shocks?”. Journal on International Constitutional Law, Vol 9 Issue 1,p. 3-26
Cote M, Nightingale AJ (2012) “Resilience thinking meets social theory: situating social change in socio-ecological systems (SES) research.” Prog Hum Geogr vol.36. no4. pp475–489.
Darvishzadeh, Mohammad (2024) " The Concept of Research and Development in Public Law", Journal of Research and Development in Public Law, Volume 1. Issue 1, pp. 7-13" doi: 10.22034/jrpl.2025.721268 (in Persian)
Diamond. Larry, (2015) “Facing Up to Democratic Recession” Journal of democracy,vol 26. no1. pp141-155.
Dixon, Rosalind, and David Landau. (2015) "Transnational constitutionalism and a limited doctrine of unconstitutional constitutional amendment." International journal of constitutional law 13.3. pp606-638
Dyzenhaus. David & Alma Diamond, (2021) "The Resilient Constitution" in Alejandro Linares Cantillo, ed, Constitutionalism: Old Dilemmas, New Insights (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
Gárdos-Orosz. Fruzsina and Nóra Bán-Forgác (2025)” The (Non)Resilience of the Hungarian Legal System: From Populist Constitutionalism to a Permanent State of Danger” In: Fruzsina Gárdos-Orosz Editor. The Resilience of the Hungarian Legal System since 2010 A Failed Resilience? Springer.
Goto, Erik and Viktor Olivér Lőrincz. (2010) “Resilience Thinking: Emergence, Conceptualisations, and Applicability in Social Systems and Law”. European Union and its Neighbours in a Globalized World. Vol16.pp209-224
Grabenwarter, Christoph: Constitutional Resilience, VerfBlog, 2018/12/06, https://verfassungsblog.de/constitutional-resilience/, DOI: 10.17176/20190212-110238-0.
Huq. Aziz & Tom Ginsburg(2018) “How to Lose a Constitutional Democracy”, California Law Review.. vol 65. pp77-169
Jakab, A(2006) ‘German Constitutional Law and Doctrine on State of Emergency—Paradigms and Dilemmas of a Traditional (Continental) Discourse’ (2006) German Law Journal. Vol 7
Jakab. András. (2022) “Constitutional Resilience” in: Rainer Grote, Frauke Lachenmann, Rüdiger Wolfrum (eds.): Max Planck Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law. (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2022) Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4656217 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4656217
Lutz. Donald, (2006) Principles of Constitutional Design.New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
Marsh.Ian, (2013)”The Decline of Democratic Governance: An Analysis and a Modest Proposal he Political Quarterly, vol 84. no2. pp 228-237
Murphy.Colleen, (2017)The Conceptual Foundations of Transitional Justice.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Olsson. Jerneck. L, A, Thoren H, Persson J, O’Byrne D (2015) “Why resilience is unappealing to social science: theoretical and empirical investigations of the scientific use of resilience.” Science Advances. vol1. no4. pp1–12
Pal. Michael(2011) Breakdowns in the Democratic Process and the Law of Canadian Democracy, McGill Law Journal, 57(2), 299-347
Rasekh, Mohammad (2025) " Editor in Chief’s Note", Journal of Research and Development in Public Law, Volume 2. Issue 3, pp. 7-11" doi: 10.22034/jrpl.2025.726150 (in Persian)
Sekerák, Marián. (2025) "Constitutional Amendments, Democratic Resilience, and the Threat of Political Regime Change: The Case of Slovakia." Communist and Post-Communist Studies. pp 1-24
Skowronek, Stephen, and Karen Orren. (2020)"The adaptability paradox: Constitutional resilience and principles of good government in twenty-first-century America." Perspectives on Politics vol18. no2,pp354-369