This study introduces the General Theory of Error Correction, based on the fundamental premise that all errors, regardless of their origin or context, must be corrected. The article aims to articulate the foundations, sources, scope, and implications of this theory within the framework of the Iranian legal system.
The paper begins by defining key concepts related to error and its correction. It then explores the theoretical foundations and historical background of the concept. Subsequently, it examines the theory’s scope within both Islamic jurisprudence and Iranian statutory law, outlining its domain and dimensions within Iran’s legal landscape.
Additionally, the study briefly surveys the relevance of this theory across other disciplines and fields of knowledge. Finally, it analyzes the consequences of adopting this theory for the legal system. These consequences constitute the core findings of the research. The results indicate that embracing the General Theory of Error Correction could enhance the legal system’s flexibility in areas such as policy-making, legislation, legal interpretation, adjudication, and enforcement, thereby promoting more effective justice and reducing the injustices caused by inevitable human errors.