Research and Development in Public Law

Research and Development in Public Law

Memory Laws and the Regulation of Collective Memory: Analyzing Legal Consequences in Light of Democratic Principles

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Law, Faculty of Humanities, university of Gonabad .Gonabad.Iran
2 Department of Law, Faculty of Administrative and Economic Sciences, University of Bojnord, Bojnord, Iran
Abstract
This research, employing a descriptive-analytical approach, conducts a comparative study of memory laws as a legal intervention for shaping and regulating collective memory. Although the memory laws, which originated from the fields of post-colonialism, negationism, and national identity management, were formed with the intention of protecting the victims, preventing the distortion of the truth, and strengthening democracy, and they include a range of symbolic actions to criminalizations, nevertheless, in practice, they have sometimes become a tool for collective memory engineering, establishing the government's official narrative, and limiting freedom of expression. Focusing on memory laws as a tool for shaping cultural memory and public discourse, the current research analyzes the typology of these laws and the theoretical and practical challenges related to them. As a result, the following key questions are raised: Is it possible and desirable to protect the memory of historical events through legislative interventions? If the answer is positive, should the desired function of such measures be punitive or merely symbolic? And if such an intervention is considered justified, what frameworks and limitations should be considered to ensure its compatibility with democratic principles, especially freedom of expression?Analysis shows that while these laws attempt to legally recognize historical injustices, affirm the dignity of victims, and prevent the recurrence of tragedies, they possess a high potential to become a political tool for controlling the official narrative of historical events and limiting freedom of expression. Citing critics’ concerns, this study argues that the criminalization of alternative historical interpretations is an example of over-criminalization and conflicts with some democratic principles. On the other hand, mechanisms such as multilateral education, facilitating independent research on historical events and incidents, and forming fact-finding commissions offer non-punitive and more principled paths to preserving historical memory. Finally, this study emphasizes the need to remove the regulation of these laws from the scope of ideological governance and to formulate them based on collective understanding and through independent institutions, so that memorial laws, instead of consolidating power, pave the way for historical truth and fairness within the context of free dialogue
Keywords
Subjects

Abdurrahmani, B., & Abdurrahmani, T. (2024). Transitional Justice in Albania: The Politics of Truth Revelation About Past Human Violations Through Access to the Secret Files and Preservation of the Collective Memory. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 14(3), 166-181
Bachmann, K., Lyubashenko, I., Garuka, C., Baranowska, G., & Pavlaković, V. (2020). The Puzzle of Punitive Memory Laws: New Insights into the Origins and Scope of Punitive Memory Laws. East European Politics and Societies, 35(4), 996-1012
Balynska, O. (2024). Memory as a Semiotic Tool for Formation of General Human Rights and the Historical and National Legal Policy of the State. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, (1), 746-753
Baranowska, G. (2023). Protecting the Good Name of the Nation as Memory Law. European Constitutional Law Review, 19(4), 623–641
Baranowska, G., Castellanos-Jankiewicz, L. (2020). Historical Memory in Post-communist Europe and the Rule of Law: An Introduction. European Papers, 5(1),95-106
Barton Hronešová, J., & Hasić, J. (2024). The 2021 Memory Law in Bosnia and Herzegovina – Reconciliation or Polarization? Journal of Genocide Research, 26(4), 399–417
Belavusau, U. (2018). The Rise of Memory Laws in Poland: An Adequate Tool to Counter Historical Disinformation? Security and Human Rights, 29(1-4), 36-54
Belavusau, U. (2023). Law and Politics of Memory. In M. Mälksoo (Ed.), Handbook on the Politics of Memory (pp. 65-80). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Belavusau, U. (2025). Memory Laws on Slavery in France and the Netherlands: From Guillotines to Windmills. Law Critique, 36(2), 229-254
Belavusau, U. and Gliszczyńska-Grabias, A. (2020). The Remarkable Rise of ‘Law and Historical Memory’ in Europe: Theorizing Trends and Prospects in the Recent Literature. Journal of Law and Society,47(2), 325-338.
Bucholc, M. (2019). Commemorative Lawmaking: Memory Frames of the Democratic Backsliding in Poland After 2015. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 11(2),1-26
Chang, V. K. L. (2024). China’s Memory Laws: The Global Reach of Beijing’s Push to Juridify Memory, VerfBlog, 2024/5/02, https://verfassungsblog.de/chinas-memory-laws/, DOI: 10.59704/1f87af2ed1d04d97.
Cherviatsova, A. (2018). Memory Wars: The Polish-Ukrainian Battle about History, VerfBlog, https://verfassungsblog.de/memory-wars-the-polish-ukrainian-battle-about-history/, DOI: 10.17176/20180209-105826.
Council of Europe.(2018).Memory Laws and Freedom of Expression: Thematic Factsheet,”https://rm.coe.int/factsheet-on-memory-laws-july2018-docx/16808c1690
Curran, V G. (2011). History, Memory and Law. Roger Williams University Law Review, 16(1), 100-109
De Baets, A. (2018). Laws Governing the Historian’s Free Expression, in B. Bevernage and N. Wouters, The Palgrave Handbook of State-Sponsored History after 1945(pp. 39-67). London: Palgrave Macmillan
Demirel, C. (2022). the dilemma of memory laws, Baltic Worlds BW 2022:1-2, 57-60
European Commission for Democracy through Law. (2015). Venice Commission Opinion no. 823/2015, available at: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2015)041-e
Fijalkowski, A. (2014). The criminalisation of symbols of the past: expression, law and memory. International Journal of Law in Context, 10(3), 295–314
Fittante, D. (2024). Memory Fusion, Diplomatic Agency, and Armenian Genocide Recognition in the Czech Republic. International Political Sociology, 18(2), 1-19
Gliszczyńska-Grabias, A., Baranowska, G., Wójcik, A., Sadowski, M., Vorobiova, A. (2023). Memory Laws in Poland and Hungary: Report by the Research Consortium ‘The Challenges of Populist Memory Politics and Militant Memory Laws (MEMOCRACY)’. Poland: Polish Academy of Sciences
Grandjean, G. (2019). Official memories and legal constraints: A classification of memory instruments in France and Belgium. Memory Studies, 14(2), 501-520
Ionescu, A., & Wei, L. (2025). Legislating Memory: The Use of Law to Shape Historical Consciousness in Divided Societies.Interdisciplinary Studies in Society, Law, and Politics, 4(1), 287-297
Kahn, R. (2019). Free Speech, Official History and Nationalist Politics: Toward a Typology of Objections to Memory Laws. Florida Journal of International Law, 31(1),33-53
Koposov, N. (2017). Memory Laws in Eastern Europe. In Memory Laws, Memory Wars: The Politics of the Past in Europe and Russia (pp. 126–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koposov, N. (2018). Memory Laws: Historical Evidence in Support of the Slippery Slope Argument, VerfBlog, https://verfassungsblog. de/memory-laws-historical-evidence-in-support-of-the-slippery-slope-argument/, DOI: 10.17176/20180108-150448.
Koposov, N. (2020), Historians, Memory Laws, and the Politics of the Past, European Papers, 5(1), 107-117
Koposov, N. (2021). Populism and Memory: Legislation of the Past in Poland, Ukraine, and Russia. East European Politics and Societies, 36(1), 272-297
Krotoszyński, M. (2019). Transitional Justice and the Constitutional Crisis: The Case of Poland (2015-2019). Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej,21(3), 22-39
Ledoux, S (2021), Memory laws in Europe. What common horizons are we journeing towards? Observing Memories, 34-41. https://hal.science/hal-03913277/document
MacDonald, D. (2015). Canada's history wars: indigenous genocide and public memory in the United States, Australia and Canada. Journal of Genocide Research, 17(4), 411-431
Mansourabadi A, Mansourabadi A. (2025). The Rule of Law and the principle of legality of Criminal Law. Journal of Research and Development in public law. 2(3), 348-382 doi: 10.22034/jrpl.2025.2055691.1139 (In Persian).
Sadeghi S, Eslami T. (2025). Foundations of Criminalization of National Flag and Anthem Desecration and Its Conflict with the Right to Freedom of Expression (A Comparative Study of Criminal Policy in Eight Countries), Journal of Research and Development in Comparative Law, e731368. doi: 10.22034/law.2025.2070284.1695 (In Persian)
Schiller, R. (2019). Law and Public History: The Legal History of Memory Regulation in Twentieth-Century Europe, JOTWELL (May 13, 2019) (reviewing Nikolay Koposov, Memory Laws, Memory Wars: The Politics of the Past in Europe and Russia (2018)), https://legalhist.jotwell.com/law-and-public-history-the-legal-history-of-memory-regulation-in-twentieth-century-europe/.
Stenlund, K., Erkkila, V. (2025). On Memory, Law, and Politics: An Introduction. Law Critique, 36(2), 183–190
Tavakoli, F., Aghababaei, H., Shahmalekpour, H. (2015). Religious Foundations and the Principles of Criminalization of Blasphemy and the Challenges. Criminal Law Research, 6(2), 49-74 (In Persian)
Vaala M, Zokaei S. (2023). Memory, narrative and protracted identity conflict in post-revolutionary Iran. Society Culture Media,12(46), 35-63(In Persian).
Vorobiova, A. (2026). Education or Indoctrination? The Impact of Memory Laws on History Education in Russia: International Human Rights Law Perspective. The International Journal of Children's Rights, 34(1), 138-162
Wójcik, A. (2018). Memory Laws and Security, VerfBlog, 2018/1/05, http://verfassungsblog.de/memory-laws-and-security/, DOI:https://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20180105-083951
Wójcik, A. (2023). Memory Laws, Rule of Law, and Democratic Backsliding: The Case of Poland, Journal of Illiberalism Studies,3(3),71-87
Wójcik, A., & Rhein-Fischer, P. (2023). Introduction to the Special Section ‘Memory Laws and the Rule of Law. European Constitutional Law Review, 19(4), 591–601