Research and Development in Public Law

Research and Development in Public Law

The Transformation of Political Representation in Comparative Constitutional Law: From Classical Democracy to Platform-Based Participation

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of International Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of public and international law, faculty of law and political science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran
Abstract
Political representation is one of the key concepts in contemporary systems of public law; a notion that emerges at the intersection of the general will, institutional authority, and political legitimacy. Since the formation of the modern state, this concept has undergone multiple phases of conceptual redefinition and structural transformation. In the historical trajectory spanning from classical Greek democracy and modern parliamentary models to the fluid condition of the digital platform era, the boundaries between representation and participation, political agency and algorithmic systems, and law and data have become increasingly blurred and contested. This article, through a comparative and analytical approach, seeks to revisit these transformations in light of foundational theories in the philosophy of public law, critical discourses on representation, and the legal-institutional practices emerging in contemporary governance. To this end, the experiences of selected jurisdictions including Germany (marked by tensions between elite-centered parliamentary structures and emerging participatory platforms), Estonia and Taiwan (pioneers of digital democracy and institutionalized CrowdLaw), Switzerland (with its semi-direct referendum-based model), and the United States (under platform-driven pressures on its party system) are critically examined. Subsequently, the article evaluates the conceptual and legal dimensions of political representation in the Islamic Republic of Iran, with a focus on constitutional principles, the performance of representative institutions, and prevailing structural challenges. Finally, by offering a set of policy and legal proposals, the article explores the legal, technological, and institutional pathways toward a hybrid model of political representation grounded in transparency, accountability, and platform-based participation. Rebuilding representation in Iran requires a hybrid model; one that neither leads to the negation of existing institutions nor to an unquestioning fascination with technology, but rather establishes a link between parliament, councils, and digital platforms. Such a model can revive the capital of public trust and show that representation is still alive, provided that it speaks to the will of the people in the present and in the language of transparency and accountability.
Keywords
Subjects

Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2018). Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media & Society, 20(3), 973–989. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676645
Arasta, M. J. & Jafarzadeh Bahaabadi, A. (2024). "The right to an efficient legislative system" in cases of executive dysfunction caused by a void in ordinary law (based on Paragraph 15 of the General Policies of the Legislative System and Article 71 of the Constitution). Research and Development in Public Law, 1(1), 49-84. doi: 10.22034/jrpl.2025.720744 (In Persian)
Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. University of Chicago Press.
Bahadori Jahromi, Ali, and Alipour, Mohammad Reza (2012). Legal Feasibility Study of Crowdsourcing the Revision of Laws and Regulations. Quarterly Journal of Public Law Knowledge, 11(35), 25–50. (In Persian).
Blum, R., & Zuber, C. I. (2016). Liquid democracy: Potentials, problems, and perspectives. Journal of Political Philosophy, 24(2), 162–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12065
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power (J. B. Thompson, Ed.; G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Harvard University Press
Chou, M. (2020). Taiwan’s Democratic Innovations and the Promise of Digital Deliberation. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 16(1), 1–20.
Copleson, Frederick (1988). Kant. Translated by Manouchehr Bozorgmehr. Tehran: Sharif University of Technology. (In Persian)
Derrida, J. (1982). Margins of Philosophy (A. Bass, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.
Enayat, Hamid (1960). Foundation of Political Philosophy in the West from Heraclitus to Hobbes. Tehran: Farmand. (In Persian)
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Pantheon Books
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (W. Rehg, Trans.). MIT Press
Habibnezhad, S. and Ansari jam, H. (2025). Common Denominator of Separation of Powers Theories (From Separation of Powers in Contemporary Constitutional Law to Independence of Powers in Iranian Constitutional Law). Research and Development in Public Law, 2(3), 83-110. doi: 10.22034/jrpl.2025.2055916.1141 (In Persian)
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1994), Principles of the Philosophy of Right. Translated by Ezatollah Foladvand. Tehran: Kharazmi. (In Persian)
Hobbes, Thomas (2002). Leviathan. Translated by Hossein Bashirieh. Tehran: Ney Publishing House. (In Persian)
Karami, Saeed. (1401). Transparency of votes of members of parliament: Necessities and necessities. Islamic Law Quarterly, 19(75), 141–159. (In Persian).
Klonick, K. (2020). The Facebook Supreme Court: Private online speech governance. Harvard Law Review, 134(1), 1–82. https://harvardlawreview.org/2020/11/the-facebook-supreme-court/
Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How Democracies Die. Crown Publishing.
Locke, John (2013). Two Treatises on Government. Translated by Farshad Shariat. Tehran: Negah Moaser. (In Persian)
Loughlin, M. (2010). The Foundations of Public Law. Oxford University Press
Madise, Ü., & Martens, T. (2006). E-voting in Estonia 2005: The first practice of country-wide binding Internet voting in the world. Electronic Voting 2006: Proceedings of the Second International Conference, 15–26. https://cs.emis.de/LNI/Proceedings/Proceedings86/GI-Proceedings-86-1.pdf
Manin, B. (1997). The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge University Press.
Merkel, W. (2014). Is there a crisis of democracy? Democratic Theory, 1(2), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2014.010202
Mohammadi Ahmadabadi, Hossein, and Barzegar Khosravi, Mohammad. (1401). Legal Feasibility Study of Transparency of Representatives' Votes. Quarterly Journal of Public Law Knowledge, 11(38), 26–56. (In Persian).
Mohammadi-Ahmadabadi, Hossein, and Saberi-Demneh, Ali. (1402). Study and analysis of the foundations and dimensions of transparency of the three branches of government. Report of the Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, serial number 19854. (In Persian).
Noveck, B. S. (2018). Smart Citizens, Smarter State: The Technologies of Expertise and the Future of Governing. Harvard University Press.
Ott, B. L. (2017). The age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the politics of debasement. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 34(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1266686
Pasquale, F. (2015). The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Harvard University Press
Rafi'i Alavi, Seyyed Ahmad. (1402). Philosophy of Law in Parliamentary Transparency with Application to the Study of the Provisions of the Transparency of Representatives' Votes. Quarterly Journal of Philosophy of Law, 2(1), 73–98. (In Persian).
Rousseau, J.-J. (1762). The Social Contract. (Trans. Maurice Cranston, 1968). Penguin Classics
Schmitt, C. (1928). Constitutional Theory (J. Seitzer, Trans., 2008 ed.). Duke University Press.
Serdült, U. (2014). E-voting in Switzerland. In Krimmer, R. (Ed.), Modernizing Democracy (pp. 177–190)
Strayer, Joseph (2016). History of the Modern State in the Middle Ages. Translated by Hossein Badamchi. Tehran: Negah Moaser. (In Persian)
Tufekci, Z. (2018). Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. Yale University Press. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300215120/twitter-and-tear-gas/
van der Sloot, B., & van Schendel, S. (2022). Digital democracy and the rule of law: Navigating between participation and legitimacy. Computer Law & Security Review, 46, 105727.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105727